FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
FEC press release re the dismissal of LaRouche's complaint against Red Letter Press, Nov. 4, 2004.
Case documents re the FEC's investigation of the Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee (select case type ADR, type in 311 as case number). U.S. Court of Appeals decision (March 3, 2006) rejects LaRouche's petition for review of FEC repayment order re his 2000 matching funds. The FEC had once again caught Lyndon "marking-up" charges to vendors affiliated exclusively with his organization, and had ordered him to pay back $222,034. Convicted felon LaRouche runs this scam in every election cycle--when is the government going to stop giving him what amounts to interest-free loans at taxpayer expense? U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C. rules on the right of Democratic Party officials to exclude two LaRouche delegates from the 1996 national convention. Upholds the district court’s dismissal of LaRouche’s consitututional claims, remands other claims to a district court panel of three judges. LaRouche accountant Richard Welsh loses (1996) appeal of his 1990 conviction on charges relating to LaRouche’s loan fraud schemes. LaRouche letter (1987) to U.S. Senator Joseph P. Biden re the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearings on Anthony M. Kennedy's nomination to the Supreme Court. LaRouche takes the occasion to predict an imminent massive financial collapse "not later than 1989, plunging the world into an economic depression comparable to that Europe has not suffered [sic] since the fourteenth century." LaRouche was apparently expressing once again his longing for a worse-than-the-Weimar-Republic economic implosion that could offer him at least a smidgeon of hope of replaying Hitler's rise to power. Alas, his projection of economic disaster (which he claimed was based on Reimannian-Gaussian mathematics) proved totally wrong, as have dozens of similar predictions by college dropout LaRouche since the 1970s-- giving him a record in the prophetic line roughly comparable to Edgar Cayce (and much worse than H.G. We!
lls).
U.S. FEDERAL COURTS
U.S. SENATE TESTIMONY
Much, much more to come